Taming the Furious Five I – Legal ‘Mantis’ Reasoning
Mantis was a petulantly impatient warrior who was prone to jumping to conclusions and making impulsive decisions. When this habit got himself captured by crocodile
November 1, 2017
Taming the Furious Five I – Legal ‘Mantis’ Reasoning
Legal Reasoning for CLAT: Constitutional Law II
Q.13 Facts: A religious sect had the practice of offering prayers five times in a day-early morning, late morning, early afternoon, early evening and late
March 18, 2017
Legal Reasoning for CLAT: Constitutional Law
Q.1 Facts: Ranjit Singh, a resident of the State of Punjab, is denied admission in a premier government institute located in Maharashtra on the basis
March 17, 2017
Legal Reasoning for CLAT: Understanding the Law of Contracts
1. Principle: All agreements are contracts if they are made by the free consent of the parties to the contract. If a person was forced
March 17, 2017
An enigma, that is Legal Reasoning
By Adithya Iyer When I was supposed to be preparing for CLAT, I at least pretended to study logic, read up on current affairs and
February 23, 2017
Legal Reasoning for CLAT: Tort of Malicious Prosecution
A company called IN Corp discovered a case of financial mismanagement upon general audit. An inquiry committee was constituted and it was to table its
May 7, 2016
Legal Reasoning for CLAT: Understanding the Tort of Defamation
By Siddharth Dey Nikhil is an expert thief. Apart from being the slippery cat that he is, Nikhil has a complete distaste towards Richa. Richa
February 17, 2016
Legal Reasoning: 50 Practice Questions
LEGAL REASONING: Practice Questions for CLAT 2016 The following are the top legal reasoning: practice questions for CLAT 2016 offered to you by our CLAT
February 11, 2016
Legal Reasoning for CLAT : Practice Questions on Trespass
Practice Questions: 1. Every person has a right to complete immunity of his person from physical interference of others, except in so far as the
January 30, 2016
Legal Reasoning for CLAT: Tort of Trespass
“TRESPASSER” “Trespassers will be prosecuted”, are four words which you must have seen ‘n’ number of times, written on a board, and hung on a
January 30, 2016
Legal Reasoning for CLAT : 9 Practice Questions on Nuisance
Nobody shall make use of his property in a way which causes damage to others. Any such use constitutes private nuisance, a wrongful act
January 23, 2016
Legal Reasoning for CLAT: The Tort of Nuisance
As I write this, the neighbourhood school is conducting its annual fest. The noise is in the superlative, the speakers are terrible, the singing is
January 23, 2016
Legal Reasoning for CLAT: Statutory Authority under the General Defences in Torts
By Siddharth Dey The power to take personal property from an individual is rooted in the idea of eminent domain. Eminent domain is the state’s
November 25, 2015
General Defences in Tort: Plaintiff the Wrong-doer and Right of Private Defence
Firstly, a very Happy Diwali to all of you! I hope you enjoyed it as much as we did (evident from the inactivity over the
November 14, 2015
General Defences in Tort: Inevitable Accident
Inevitable Accidents are, as evident from the name, events which could not have been prevented by the parties through the exercise of ordinary care, caution,
November 7, 2015
General Defences in Tort: Necessity
It’s the peak of summer. Your neighbour is fed up of the heat, and packs his bags for the mountains…no, not for sanyas, but for
October 31, 2015
Volenti Non Fit Injuria: Legal Reasoning for CLAT
Siddharth Dey As I start with this new chapter on general defences, you might ask why we are studying general defences right now. Unless we
October 18, 2015
Legal Reasoning Questions for CLAT: Law of Torts
This set of questions, compiled by our CLAT coaching in Kolkata experts, from Legal Reasoning is based on Law of Torts. 1. PRINCIPLE: A plaintiff
October 10, 2015
Legal Reasoning for CLAT: Test II
1. PRINCIPLE: Damage without the infringement of a person’s legal right is not actionable in a court of law. If the interference with the rights
October 8, 2015
A recap of Legal Reasoning
This article is a follow up to the previous one here (a must read called, ‘Legal Reasoning for CLAT’). So, it’s been quite some time
October 4, 2015
CLAT Tips: How to Crack CLAT
CLAT TIPS Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2016 is expected to see nearly 35,000 law aspirants slug it out for around 1,800 seats available in
March 11, 2015
Negligence : Legal Reasoning for CLAT
NEGLIGENCE Negligence is the breach of a duty caused by the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided by those considerations, which ordinarily
February 23, 2015
Law of Torts vis-a-vis Legal Reasoning for CLAT
Tort is the French equivalent of the English word ‘wrong’. It is derived from the Latin term tortum and implies conduct which is twisted or
February 1, 2015
Law of Tort or The Law of Torts and Why it Matters for a CLAT Aspirant
CLATapult’s modules are different. We teach you not only for CLAT but also for your life as a law student and beyond. Now, this might
August 27, 2012