Legal Reasoning for CLAT: Test II
1. PRINCIPLE: Damage without the infringement of a person’s legal right is not actionable in a court of law. If the interference with the rights
October 8, 2015
Legal Reasoning for CLAT: Test II
Legal Reasoning Practice Questions : Test I
1. Principle: Negligence is committed when there is a breach of duty of care and it results in damage to his neighbor. A neighbor is
October 7, 2015
A recap of Legal Reasoning
This article is a follow up to the previous one here (a must read called, ‘Legal Reasoning for CLAT’). So, it’s been quite some time
October 4, 2015
Understanding the Law of Torts for CLAT: Its Constituents
INTRODUCTION The previous chapter introduced you to the concept of a tort. It is the failure to perform a legal duty ( A legal duty
September 22, 2015
Law of Torts: Understanding its relevance in CLAT
CHAPTER 1: THE LAW OF TORTS AN INTRODUCTION Since all good books have a nice beginning so should this one. So here we go :
September 21, 2015
Legal Reasoning & its mighty significance in CLAT
Legal reasoning as we all know is the sine qua non (google it to know what it means!) of the Common Law Admission test. This
August 17, 2015
Negligence : Legal Reasoning for CLAT
NEGLIGENCE Negligence is the breach of a duty caused by the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided by those considerations, which ordinarily
February 23, 2015
Trespass : Legal Reasoning for CLAT
TRESPASS TO LAND Trespass, in its widest sense, signifies any transgression or offence against the law of nature, of society, or of the country, whether
February 18, 2015
Defamation : Legal Reasoning for CLAT
A defamatory statement is a statement calculated to expose a person to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or to injure him in his trade, business, and
February 10, 2015
Law of Torts vis-a-vis Legal Reasoning for CLAT
Tort is the French equivalent of the English word ‘wrong’. It is derived from the Latin term tortum and implies conduct which is twisted or
February 1, 2015
Vicarious Liability in Legal Reasoning for CLAT 2.0
LIABILITY BY RELATION: VICARIOUS LIABILITY Master and Servant A servant and independent contractor are both employed to do some work of the employer but there is
January 25, 2015
Vicarious Liability in Legal Reasoning for CLAT
Generally, a person is not liable for the acts of another person. However, a person can be held liable for the acts of another person
January 20, 2015
Don’t Apply Your Own Knowledge to Answer a Legal Reasoning Question
By Diwakar Kishore Don’t apply your own knowledge to answer a legal reasoning question! Legal Aptitude/Legal Reasoning has always been my favorite section of the
March 9, 2014
CLAT Legal Reasoning Question- 1 | Torts | Negligence, Volenti Non Fit Injuria
Principle 1: In common law, a person can claim damages from another person where that other person owed the first person a duty of care
September 5, 2012
Why Rabbi Shergill’s Song ‘Bilqis’ is CLATapult’s first lesson in Legal Aptitude
What shapes our minds is what influences our reason. What shapes our minds also defines and develops our aptitudes. Reading ‘text’ of a Legal Reasoning
August 29, 2012